Search for: "Derring v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 564
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2011, 4:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
**Of 102(g)Creative contends that the ’373 Patent is invalid un- der § 102(g)(2) because of Creative’s prior invention. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
See also the commentary on A 99 in Singer/Stauder, 5th edition, 2010, at point 58 “Im Gegensatz zum Patentinhaber hat der Einsprechende keine materiellrechtliche, sondern nur eine verfahrensrechtliche Rechtsposition. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:01 am
Today's the day the Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment in Case C-462/09 Stichting de Thuiskopie v Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH, Mijndert van der Lee and Hananja van der Lee, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (the Dutch Supreme Court). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:53 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Schütze: “Der gewöhnliche Aufenthaltsort juristischer Personen und die Verpflichtung zur Stellung einer Prozesskostensicherheit nach § 110 ZPO” – the English abstract reads as follows:  Under § 110 ZPO (German Code of Civil Procedure) the court – on application of the defendant – has to make an order for security for costs if the claimant is resident abroad but not resident in an EU or EWR Member State. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm by Pace Law School Library
News & Analysis 10126-10135 (2011).Evans, John C. and Donald R. van der Vaart. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:58 am
DuMont Schauberg Expedition der Kölnischen Zeitung GmbH & Co KG. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:05 am by JB
Both are fully available to the United States, and, moreover, the United States is currently employing them. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
Louis Vuitton v Nadia Plesner). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Those sources include “the words of the claims themselves, the remain- der of the specification, the prosecution history, and extrinsic evidence concerning relevant scientific princi- ples, the meaning of technical terms, and the state of the art. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm by Marie Louise
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:03 am
462/09 Stichting de Thuiskopie v Mijndert van der Lee, Hananja van der Lee and Opus Supplies Deutschland GmbH, this being a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (visit the 1709 Blog here for some interesting background material). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am by Marie Louise
Van der Land (EPLAW) District Court of The Hague finds patent covering method for affixing and removing hair-extensions to and from natural hair obvious:  SES v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:23 pm by Veronika Gaertner
The authors criticise the recent ECJ judgment in Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:16 am by Gilles Cuniberti
On December 22nd, the European Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Joseba Andoni Aguirre Zarraga v. [read post]