Search for: "Doe 1-8" Results 441 - 460 of 32,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2013, 3:28 pm by Virginia Hunt
 I just received statistical information for Fiscal Year 2013 (July 1, 2012 to July 1, 2013), and over this past year,  only 8 benefit penalties were issued. [read post]
25 May 2021, 8:26 am by Yuanchung Lee
Palomar-Santiago, No. 20-437 (May 24, 2021), Justice Sotomayor ruled for a unanimous Court that as a matter of statutory interpretation (1) each of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:30 pm by Unknown
How the EU Deals with Afghan Asylum Seekers," Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration, vol. 8, no. 1 (2019) [full-text]#Portichiusi: The Human Costs of Migrant Deterrence in the Mediterranean (SSRN, Sept. 2019) [text]"Second Generation from Refugee Backgrounds in Europe," Comparative Migration Studies, 7:40 (Dec. 2019) [open access]The "Temporary Solidarity Mechanism" on Relocation of People Rescued at Sea - What Does It Say? [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:57 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
,--> Rejection 1 (Ground 5)--> Rejections 2, 3 and 5 (Grounds 6, 7, 9)In terms of law, Superguide Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:04 pm by Kirk Jenkins
O’Meara, No. 114044 – Does the six-month statute of limitations in the Probate Code, 755 ILCS 5/8-1, apply to a separate tort action for interference with testamentary expectancy which -- if successful -- would have the practical effect of invalidating the will? [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 8:15 am
8-1-2008 New Jersey:GALLOWAY TOWNSHIP - An attorney filed for permission Thursday to appeal before the state Supreme Court a decision upholding the invalidity of local ordinances limiting where sex offenders can live. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Nicole Kellner-Swick
See IRC § 7701(a)(1). [2] IRS Pub. 594; see also IRC § 6321. [3] IRC § 6322 [4] IRC § 6502 [5] See IRC §6502, 6503 [6] IRC §6323. [7] IRC § 6323(f) . [8] As to a Judgment Lien see Treas. [read post]
28 May 2020, 10:47 am by Mark Theodore and Heylee Bernstein
The case asked the Board to consider whether a series of broad proposals made by the employer during collective bargaining amounted to bad faith bargaining and 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(5) violations. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 11:30 pm by Nico Cordes
The appellant further submits that, according to G 8/95, Rule 140 EPC was available in the present case because it had not been the true intention of the examining division to grant a patent with only pages 1 and 3 of the claim set submitted with the letter dated 12 August 2014, i.e. not including pages 2 and 4 of the claims.The board does not concur with the appellant. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
I know that sounds so much like lawyer double talk but let me explain why it is not (or maybe show why we cannot always give a simple answer to an abstract question).IC 31-16-8-1(b) sets out how often a child support order may be modified:Except as provided in section 2 of this chapter, modification may be made only:(1) upon a showing of changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unreasonable; or (2) upon a showing that: (A) a… [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:54 pm
A MegaBabe in 1992 (Honey, I Blew up the Kid- the largely forgotten sequel to Honey, I Shrunk the Kids)Do you need to start IP infringement proceedings in order to get information about an infringer under Article 8(1) IP Enforcement Directive? [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 8:52 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Other examples where the Administration has relied on INA 274A(h)(3) include the granting of EADs to those who have been paroled into the United States under humanitarian parole under 8 CFR 274.12(c)(11), F-1 students who are in a period of practical training (8 CFR 274.12(c)(3)), applicants with pending I-485 applications (8 CFR 274.12(c)(9)), applicants with pending cancellation of removal applications (8 CFR 274.12(c)(10)), recipients of Deferred… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:56 am
Hard Drive's work does not promote the useful arts. 88. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 9:23 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
There might be an "anomaly" in treatment of S. 8 petitions and S. 11 petitions insofar as appeal is concerned but that does not mean that an amendment has to be carried out. [read post]