Search for: "Doe v. National Medical Services" Results 441 - 460 of 1,902
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
But Engine raises pretty much the same issues as app developers face.Pro-Samsung #4: Hispanic Leadership Fund, National Black Chamber of Commerce, National Grange (rural communities)Minority advocacy groups Hispanic Leadership Fund and National Black Chamber of Commerce once again teamed up with the National Grange of the Order of the Patrons of Husbandry (advocacy group representing America's farmers and rural communities) to voice their specific concerns… [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
The National Council on Disability has posted the following Notice of Funding Opportunity: Bioethics and Disability. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:18 am by Administrator
Labour Law: Essential Services; Right to Strike; Freedom of AssociationSaskatchewan Federation of Labour v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 6:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
I'm pretty skeptical about this analysis, and in particular the arguments that the presence of narrow medical exceptions requires the granting of religious exceptions; I'm inclined to favor the First Circuit's analysis in Doe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
 The National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) defines a medication error as: "A medication error is any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use or patient harm while the medication is in the control of the health care professional, patient, or consumer. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” In the latest episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), Kate Shaw, Melissa Murray and Leah Litman “recap the argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
  This article deals with the Affordable Care Act’s expansion of eligibility, among the poor, for medical services under the federal-state Medicaid program. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
De Almeida, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2012] EWHC 1082 (Admin) – Read judgment This was a judicial review of RBK&C’s refusal to provide support under s.21 and s.29 National Assistance Act 1948 and indeed to carry out an assessment under s.47 of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:52 pm by NL
What was at stake was the Council's failure to carry out an assessment under s.47(1) of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990, under which the Council must arrange for the provision of community care services where it appears to them that a person is in need of such services. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:52 pm by NL
What was at stake was the Council's failure to carry out an assessment under s.47(1) of the National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990, under which the Council must arrange for the provision of community care services where it appears to them that a person is in need of such services. [read post]