Search for: "Does 1-12"
Results 441 - 460
of 28,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm
All documents referred to shall be [...](4) Any part of a party's appeal case which does not meet the requirements in paragraph 2 is to be regarded as an amendment, unless the party demonstrates that this part was admissibly raised and maintained in the proceedings leading to the decision under appeal. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:17 pm
., No. 1:12-CV-00582 (M.D. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:31 am
Claims 5, 6, 8-10, 12, 13, and 15 have not been arguedseparately and therefore fall with claim 1.but did win on claim 7: However, the Examiner has not set forth a prima facie case that Kernanticipates claim 7. [read post]
Interesting meal and rest break questions certified by Ninth Circuit to the California Supreme Court
7 Aug 2019, 12:38 pm
The questions posed are as follows:1.Does the absence of a formal policy regarding meal and rest breaks violate California law? [read post]
13 May 2013, 4:11 pm
(Proposition 30 resulted in a 0.25% state sales tax increase which does not apply to gas sales.)Source: Spidell's California Taxletter, Vol. 35.4, April 1, 2013. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:51 am
These incidents have been most prevalent at K-12 schools and college campuses and reflect a disturbing deterioration of the educational environment in our schools. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:51 am
These incidents have been most prevalent at K-12 schools and college campuses and reflect a disturbing deterioration of the educational environment in our schools. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:29 am
Georgia Code § 41-1-12(o). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 12:15 pm
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, 2012 Ark. 22, No. 11-881 (1-26-12) The Arkansas Supreme Court, affirming summary judgment for an insurer, upheld an exclusion to medical payments coverage contained in its policy which stated, “THERE IS NO COVERAGE FOR AN INSURED . . . [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
_r=1&partner=rs... [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:08 am
.): 1 Complaint 6-1 US Motion for Summary J 11 Two Shields Opposition 12 Two Shields Motion for Discovery 14 US Reply in Support of Motion for Summary J 15 US Opposition to Motion for Discovery 16 Two Shields Reply in Support of Motion for Discovery 17 US Request for Judicial Notice 17-1 Cobell Fairness Hearing Transcript 18 Two Shields Response to Request for Judicial Notice 19 US Reply in Support of Request for Judicial Notice 20-1 Two Shields Surreply… [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
The Court finds that the complaint does not state a cause of action because Sharpe does not allege that he disclosed his father's race against Parker until someone asked him about it. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
According to this Board, the interpretation of those decisions ignores the fact that Article 114(2) EPC does not justify such discretion, as previous case law has repeatedly stated. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
Comments are due by October 1. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:25 am
Does 1-38, the judge dismissed the case as to all John Does except Doe Number 2, due to the fact that there was no basis for joining the different John Does in a single lawsuit.As it turns out, according to a report from Technician Online, "John Doe #2" doesn't actually exist:Students win first battle with RIAAJudge rules in favor of the students' motion to quash a set of lawsuits dished out by the Recording IndustryJosh… [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 6:29 am
Further, any suit brought to which an exception applies is subject to dismissal pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 11:05 am
What kind of public does he have in mind? [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:49 am
The birth parent of the child shall retain the authority to consent to the adoption of the child or a name change for the child.(3)The birth parent of the child shall retain the obligation to pay child support.(4)The birth parent of the child shall retain the right to visitation or parenting time with the child, as determined by the court.(5)The appointment of a kinship legal guardian does not limit or terminate any rights or benefits derived from the child's parents, including, but… [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:10 pm
T.D. 9796, 12/12/2016; Reg. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 9:21 am
Issues: 1. [read post]
