Search for: "Driver v. Commonwealth " Results 441 - 460 of 492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
In 2007, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed a complaint against CRST on behalf of a class of the company’s female workers who claimed they’d been sexually harassed while employed as long-distance truck drivers. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Cases 444 (2023) [see § 61.03 n.1.2], delivery drivers were found to be employees on the basis that their service was publicly advertised to diners through its website and app. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:00 pm by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of the Commonwealth of Virginia et al. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
That sentiment was echoed by the US First Circuit last Friday in Glik v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:53 pm by Amy Leonard
In Comcare v Martin [2016] HCA 43, the High Court examined the causal connection required between the condition suffered and the reasonable administrative action. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 1:07 pm by Schwartzapfel Lawyers P.C.
One of the most recent and well-known cases in the United States would be Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Horn lost his job as a commercial truck driver after a drug test he took reflected the presence of tetrahydrocannabinol (“THC”), the active chemical compound in marijuana. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Matthew Guariglia
FRT can use any image—taken in real-time or after-the-fact—and compare it to pre-existing databases that contain driver’s license photos, mugshots, or pre-existing CCTV camera footage. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Matthew Guariglia
FRT can use any image—taken in real-time or after-the-fact—and compare it to pre-existing databases that contain driver’s license photos, mugshots, or pre-existing CCTV camera footage. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Brady and the Philadelphia Common Pleas Court case Sehl v. [read post]