Search for: "Ely Lilly"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48This is an important case about whether drugs manufactured by Actavis infringe a European patent of Lilly. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 2:30 am
This appeal considered whether a new pemetrexed based cancer treatment produced by Actavis UK Ltd & others infringes Eli Lilly & Co’s patent and its foreign designations either indirectly under the Patents Act 1977, s 60(2) (matter for appeal) or directly under a proper interpretation of the Europe Patent Convention 2000, art 69 (matter for cross-appeal). [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:53 am
Brian CorderyBy Gregory Bacon The UK Supreme Court announced this morning that it has allowed Eli Lilly’s appeal and held that Actavis’ pemetrexed products directly infringe Lilly’s European patent to pemetrexed disodium in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:53 am
Brian CorderyBy Gregory Bacon The UK Supreme Court announced this morning that it has allowed Eli Lilly’s appeal and held that Actavis’ pemetrexed products directly infringe Lilly’s European patent to pemetrexed disodium in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:12 am
The Eli Lilly Kat experiencing that Friday feeling....As reported on the IPKat (multiple times), the on-going saga between Eli Lilly and Actavis regarding Lilly's pemetrexed disodium product has kept the English courts busy for years. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
(Eli Lilly v Novopharm (2010 FCA 197)This exercise requires:Reviewing the entire specification (claims and entire disclosure)Identifying the promises made in the entire specification Determining whether the patent fulfils those promises by demonstration or sound prediction.This exercise is a question of law viewed through the skilled person at the time of filing (with the assistance of expert evidence) and has been applied in several cases (BMS v Apotex (2005 FC 1348),… [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
(Eli Lilly v Novopharm (2010 FCA 197)This exercise requires:Reviewing the entire specification (claims and entire disclosure)Identifying the promises made in the entire specification Determining whether the patent fulfils those promises by demonstration or sound prediction.This exercise is a question of law viewed through the skilled person at the time of filing (with the assistance of expert evidence) and has been applied in several cases (BMS v Apotex (2005 FC 1348),… [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:45 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351(Fed. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:30 am
The Court characterized Eli Lilly's evidence as a "hodge-podge" and took to task a Dr. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:35 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
21 May 2017, 10:00 pm
Elanco is an animal food producer and a division of Eli Lilly and Co. [read post]
16 May 2017, 5:07 am
The New York Times reports a lawsuit was filed against Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi, accusing them of “conspiring to drive up the prices” of insulin. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 am
Here's my checklist|Fujifilm v AbbVie: practice, procedure and policy analysis|Overturning a trade mark opposition decision - Part 2 - SOULUXE - likelihood of confusion|Overturning a trade mark opposition decision - Part 1 - IWATCH, descriptive goods and acquired distinctivenessNever Too Late 143 [week ending on Sunday 9 April]French court rules that resale right royalty must be only paid by sellers I Tune in LIVE for tomorrow's Eli Lilly v Actavis Supreme Court… [read post]
