Search for: "Federal, Inc." Results 441 - 460 of 57,317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 9:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
GOOD Meat, Inc., --- F.Supp.3d ---- , 2024 WL 1083462,  No. 23-cv-04145-RFL (N.D. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:06 am by Brian Albrecht
The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) recent complaint challenging the proposed merger of the supermarkets Kroger Co. and Albertsons Companies Inc. has important implications for antitrust enforcement in labor markets. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:48 am by Dan Bressler
“Judge’s Potential Recusal Over Citi Stock Divides CFPB, Industry” — “Parties in a lawsuit challenging the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s credit card late fee rule are divided on whether a federal appeals judge hearing the case might stand to financially benefit from the court fight. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under the terms of these letters, for each of the relevant years, defendant agreed to provide “compilation services” and to prepare the local, state, and federal tax returns for the clients. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
In Panuwat, the defendant was an employee of Medivation, Inc., a mid-cap oncology firm that was resisting one hostile bidder (Sanofi S.A.) and encouraging another firm (Pfizer) to outbid Sanofi. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
”As Gelwan was not a party in the federal action ( Gelmin v Quicke, 224 AD2d 481 [2d Dept 1996] [“party” refers to party in action]), and as the alleged misconduct occurred during the federal action and not here ( Chibcha Rest., Inc. v David A. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm by Jason Rantanen
Before WesternGeco, the Federal Circuit had adopted a strict territorial rule for § 271(a) damages in Power Integrations Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:20 am
Central Coast Agriculture, Inc., Appeals Nos. 22-16190 and 16281 (9th Cir. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
 The court’s opinion in In re Yellow Corporation illustrates a willingness for the bankruptcy court to apply a thoughtful case-by-case analysis in considering whether to keep a dispute even where a competing federal statute mandating arbitration exists. [read post]