Search for: "Files v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 91,312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2024, 7:00 am by Gonzalo E. Mon
A competitor filed an NAD challenge arguing that HoldOn overstates the benefits of its bags. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:18 pm by Nikki Siesel
In response, the European consortiums filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia challenging the TTAB decision. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
Circuit: We're not saying that these plaintiffs weren't on a terrorist watch list when they filed this lawsuit. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:54 am by BarronAdler
The State removed the case to federal court and then filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing there is no federal cause of action the […] The post U.S. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  It is of course too early for a substantive decision on validity and infringement in the first cases filed, most cases taking at least 12 months to reach a hearing. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
16 May 2024, 6:40 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals had reinstated a lawsuit filed by an inmate who asserts the state prison violated the First Amendment in denying him a religious meal. [read post]