Search for: "Frank Marshall"
Results 441 - 460
of 530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:00 am
For the Symposium on Gerald Leonard and Saul Cornell, The Partisan Republic: Democracy, Exclusion, and the Fall of the Founders' Constitution, 1780s-1830s (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Gerry LeonardI must begin with my earnest gratitude to Mark Graber and Jack Balkin for putting this symposium together and to each of the participants, both for their kind words and for their critical engagement with the substance of Saul Cornell’s and my book, The Partisan Republic. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:30 pm
[Longtime LHB readers will recall that for the exam in my legal history course at Georgetown Law i write an essay about some regulatory regime I did not cover in class and ask students to draw comparisons with those we did. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:03 am
(Forbes)Here's an update on the Access Copyright Hearing for a Post-Secondary tariff that supposedly was concluded on January 22, 2016.I attended to hear the final oral arguments in Access Copyright’s Post-Secondary tariff hearing at the Copyright Board on Friday, January 22, 2016. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Fiut, Harris Beach PLLC, on the brief), Buffalo, New York.Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Frank P. [read post]
3 May 2017, 1:05 pm
Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
In 2007, Robert A. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
As Chief Justice Marshall famously explained in Marbury v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 5:28 pm
Veblen is out, ordinary value for price back in, when it comes to the facts about money that matter to readers, not just attitude.Even so, certain political topics, without which the financial crisis is incomprehensible, remain firmly in the cocoon, to be mentioned blandly and vaguely if at all, starting with Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd, Chuck Schumer, Barack Obama, and their relationships to Fannie Mae lobbying money, Friends of Angelo special mortgages, etc., etc. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 1:52 pm
Miller’s a big fan of F.S. 825.103 – when used properly – and was concerned my coverage of the statute in the context of the Franke case didn’t do it justice (see here). [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Sixty Famous Cases 10 v. (1956) Van Winkle, Marshall. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:58 am
Fortunately, not all legal theorists are guilty of such neglect—Richard Posner and Cass Sunstein, for example, are well versed on these studies—and it is a positive sign that in the past decade a number judicial politics studies have been produced in collaboration with law professors and published in law journals (Frank Cross's studies stand out), making it easier for legal theorists to find.Having said these nice things, I will now offer a few… [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm
The 1980 report which created the foundation for FIPPA, the “Public Government for Private People: The Report of the Commission on Freedom of Information and Individual Privacy” (also known as the Williams Commission), explained the reasons for this as follows, If Cabinet discussions were to become a matter of public record, individual ministers would be inhibited from expressing their frank opinions for fear of later being identified as dissidents. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm
[A CNN story on the Rutgers law school controversy; the settlement agreement in the firing of Central Michigan University professor Tim Boudreau; and the views of Prof. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 8:48 am
• Frank T. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
The article is worth reading for its marshaling recent case law on the subject, but I detail of its errors here in the hopes that lawyers will speak more precisely about the concepts involved in challenging medical causation opinions. [2] Id. at 18. [read post]
17 May 2008, 9:53 am
And it pointed to notes and reports of the Office of the Fire Marshall (OFM), which both suggested an outright alleged arson, based on the foregoing facts, as well as the functioning of the alarm system, several probable points of origin of the fire, windows being left ajar, and more.Justice Wright, however, opined that the OFM used tunnel vision, and did a rush to judgment. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm
Dennis Klein The financial crisis generated a great deal of litigation, much involving the directors and officers of companies affected by the crisis. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
That three-Justice opinion (written by Justice Brennan and joined by Justices Marshall and Stevens) stressed that the tax exemption was not a permissible accommodation of religion, because it "burdens nonbeneficiaries markedly"[14] "by increasing their tax bills by whatever amount is needed to offset the benefit bestowed on subscribers to religious publications. [read post]
