Search for: "Garland v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2022, 10:51 am
Department of State’s Nov. 17 filing in Cengiz et al v. bin Salman et al stating that the department recognizes Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s sovereign immunity as a sitting head of state. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:16 am
United States [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:15 am
Garland v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 11:02 am
" Garland E. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
At issue in Simmons v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:29 am
, Shelby County v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Nebraska and Arizona v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:57 pm
In 1972, the Supreme Court had struck down all existing capital punishment laws in one of the most far-reaching opinions in its history, called Furman v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
With more than two-thirds of the states gaining more power under a one-state-one-vote system, it is difficult to believe that the convention will agree to award states votes based on population. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:17 am
” For the brief: https://www.eff.org/document/06-26-2024-eff-et-al-amicus-brief-tiktok-v-garland For EFF’s stance on TikTok bans: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/03/government-hasnt-justified-tiktok-ban Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 3:32 am
; United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 11:39 am
The fact that Honduras so quickly extradited the former president is likely a wakeup call to other heads of state and political leaders in Central America. [1] United States District Court Southern District of New York, United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 11:39 am
The fact that Honduras so quickly extradited the former president is likely a wakeup call to other heads of state and political leaders in Central America. [1] United States District Court Southern District of New York, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am
The first is Microsoft v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 3:53 pm
The question before the court in Garland v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am
In The Washington Post, Mark Berman reports on the aftermath of the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:21 am
The other problem is that its decision in Dobbs reversing Roe v. [read post]
