Search for: "Grant v. Parker"
Results 441 - 460
of 731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2010, 6:22 am
You have the sense there was no way the plaintiffs were going to win this one.The case is DeFabio v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
’ Parker v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 9:39 am
A NPA with disabled employees working fewer than 75% of direct labor hours contravenes the purpose of the AbilityOne program and may face probation or even exclusion from the program. [5] The AbilityOne OIG is equipped with a number of tools at its disposal to ensure compliance in addition to those powers granted under the IG Statute. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:28 pm
Recent Developments in Personal Care and Other Home and Community-Based Services in Medicaid and Medicare I. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 3:15 pm
” Since the 1994 Campbell v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:32 am
The case is K.L. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Sarah Grant summarized the July 24 hearing at the military commissions. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
In Midler v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 1:23 am
The case of Constantin Film Verleih GmbH v YouTube LLC concerned the movies ‘Parker’ and ‘Scary Movie 5 over which Constantin had the exclusive rights to. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 8:58 pm
Roper grants relief on what seems to be a fairly routine Batson challenge. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
HAVENNER, Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:44 am
Bartenfelder v Bartenfelder, Nos. 0934, 2052 [Ct. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
The court of appeals in Parker v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:55 pm
Parker, 182 S.W.2d 397 (Tex. 1944)). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:07 am
The Court of Appeals (Sack, Parker and Goldberg) rules in Novarro's favor, granting him qualified immunity.Here is what happened. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
”In Rivera v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 2:04 pm
In granting the motion to compel, Judge Parker wrote: “Plaintiffs argue that Nationwide is relying upon the advice and actions of McDonough as a defense despite Nationwide’s insistence that it is not asserting an ‘advice of counsel’ defense. [read post]
