Search for: "HARRIS v. DAVIS"
Results 441 - 460
of 496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2015, 10:15 am
Harris. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
University of Texas and its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 8:36 am
Davies and M. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
In that statute, Congress exercised its power under Section 3 to lift the disabilities that the provision had imposed upon large categories of Confederate officers and officials—in essence, all but the highest-ranking ones, like Confederate president Jefferson Davis. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
Coordinators have assisted over 300 families this year, and have a presence with Title V, P & A, CHIP, the Child Find Policy and Practice Committee, the Governor's Chronic Illness Task Force and the Family Resource Connection (devoted to early childhood issues)! [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Davies, Blake Hudson, Gregg P. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In 2003, in Grutter v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
It is important to emphasize, therefore, just how unprecedented that challenge is—and the potentially profound impact it could have on countless federal spending programs if the Court were to embrace it.It has long been accepted, without a whisper of any constitutional doubt, that “[a]lthough participation in the Medicaid program is entirely optional, once a State elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the [Act],” Harris v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
It is usually a happy coincidence when my two professional roles—constitutional scholar/teacher and academic administrator—come together in a work task. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:46 am
- http://t.co/ZK2wo2M (Ericka Chickowski) Cloudy Content - http://t.co/tCp9Tt3 (Robert Boeri) Cut the Law Firms, Keep the Lawyers - http://t.co/1lKFn3f (Vanessa O’Connell) Email is Still Most Popular - http://t.co/FNgxHkz (Jeff Orloff) Facebook Stalks Mobile Phone Numbers - http://t.co/YetVNXX (Kim Davis) Get Your Social Media Under Control! [read post]
