Search for: "Harrison v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 814
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2014, 11:42 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
While Michigan is generally a very creditor friendly state, recently we have had some favorable decisions for debtors. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:12 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  George Harrison, for example, was found to have infringed the copyright in the song “He’s So Fine” when he wrote “My Sweet Lord,” even though the court acknowledged that it was probably a case of unconscious borrowing (see Bright Tunes Music v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 10:37 am by Jake McGowan
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:28 am by Amy Howe
Chris Harrison at the Ogletree Deakins blog. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Harrison 13-451Issue: Whether the favorable-termination rule under Heck v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Eagle, Esquire, Sean Brennecke, Esquire, KLEHR HARRISON HARVEY BRANZBURG LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Defendants Hagai Tal and Irit Segal Itshayek.STRINE, Chancellor. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:32 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
In reversing the ZBA the Court stated: "Here, the record reflects that the Board voted to deny the petitioner's applications without making any attempt to accommodate the proposed religious use (see Matter of Harrison Orthodox Minyan v Town Bd. of Harrison, 159 AD2d 572, 573). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
Second,in Harrison v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 1736, the Court of Appeal held that the right only extended to those person who cared for children who would otherwise be compelled to leave the country.Finally, in R (Sanneh) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 793 (Admin), the Administrative Court held that the provision of subsistence payments and accommodation under s.17, Children Act 1989 were sufficient to ensure that an individual would not be compelled to leave the UK.In R (HC)… [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
Second,in Harrison v SSHD [2012] EWCA Civ 1736, the Court of Appeal held that the right only extended to those person who cared for children who would otherwise be compelled to leave the country.Finally, in R (Sanneh) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 793 (Admin), the Administrative Court held that the provision of subsistence payments and accommodation under s.17, Children Act 1989 were sufficient to ensure that an individual would not be compelled to leave the UK.In R (HC)… [read post]