Search for: "High v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 31,624
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2011, 5:35 am
, Goupil v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:32 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) JBW Group Ltd v Ministry of Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 8 (16 January 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) MK, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2012] EWHC 18 (Admin) (16 January 2012) High Court (Patents Court) Benker v The Comptroller General of Patents [2011] EWHC 3604 (Pat) (22 November 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:56 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) United States of America v Nolan [2010] EWCA Civ 1223 (09 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Gallagher & Anor, R (on the application of) v Basildon District Council [2010] EWHC 2824 (Admin) (09 November 2010) High Court (Commercial Court) Borealis AB v Geogas Trading SA [2010] EWHC 2789 (Comm) (09 November 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:44 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AJ v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1081 (21 September 2011) High Court ) Family Division) Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council v Watson [2011] EWHC 2376 (Fam) (01 September 2011) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Hackney Empire Ltd v Aviva Insurance UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 2378 (TCC) (21 September 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 7:28 am
Union of India & Anr v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 8:11 am
Andrew Hamm for SCOTUSBlog notes another possible immigration case for the high Court in his "petitions of the week. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:08 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Modaresi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1359 (23 November 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Davison v Habeeb & Ors [2011] EWHC 3031 (QB) (25 November 2011) Eden v Rubin [2011] EWHC 3090 (QB) (24 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Harvey v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC B1 (Admin) (17 November 2011) J, R… [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 9:18 am
The new case was Norman v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 6:16 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (which includes California) in the case of Zoom Video Communications, Inc., v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 4:00 am
In Chung v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
Here is the opinion in Abdow v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:15 am
(antitrust) and United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:47 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Hussain & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Health Department [2010] EWHC 3351 (Admin) (20 December 2010) Infocus Public Networks Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2010] EWHC 3309 (Admin) (17 December 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Ashdale Land and Property Company Ltd v Maioriello & Ors [2010] EWHC 3296 (Ch) (20 December… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:06 am
The recent case of Chevron Mining v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:10 am
State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
Mayo states its argument quite simply in the opening sentence of its brief, relying on the Court’s 2012 precedent in Mayo v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:13 pm
Of particular note, Justice Ginsburg commented on the same-sex marriage DOMA decision, saying she did not think SCOTUS should create a constitutional right to gay marriage, like the High Court did with abortion in Roe v Wade in 1973; far too activist she says.A little-known secret to those outside the legal industry is that Justices do not always pan-out according to the hopes and wishes of the President that appoints them. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:33 am
Cal.) jury trial in San Francisco for November 6, 2023.This means the trial will be interrupted by the Thanksgiving holiday (November 23), though it is unclear whether the trial will be interrupted for a full week or just a very long weekend.As previously reported, Google already has a huge antitrust trial coming up in the last third of this year: on September 12, the United States et al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
On 8 October 2021, His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) handed down his decision in an action brought by Royalty Pharma Collection Trust (“Royalty Pharma”) for approximately €23 million in royalty payments from Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH (“Boehringer”) (Royalty Pharma Collection Trust v Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH [2021] EWHC 2692 (Pat)). [read post]
