Search for: "Hope v. Hope"
Results 441 - 460
of 23,926
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2010, 7:07 am
FEC; Austin v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:44 am
Here is the abstract: Embedded deep in the constitutional imagination is the notion that courts can implement rights and effectuate the hope of Marbury v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:29 am
Because this issue has a lot to it, I will outline some topics I hope to address and why the parties should care. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:38 am
" Thus, Sebok hopes "that the Third Circuit distinguishes Colacicco and Levine on their facts" and that the Third Circuit finds in favor of preemption in Colacicco.We, of course, hope so, too.A less analytic, and more newsy, description of Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:54 pm
Court Upholds $200 Mln Genentech SettlementAssociated Press: Court Cuts $200M from Royalty Judgment Against GenentechSan Francisco Business Times: State Supreme Court Cuts Amount Genentech Must Pay in City of Hope Fight(UPDATES):The Recorder (via Law.com): $300 Million Award Stands Against Genentech, but $200 Million in Punitives Get TossedDaily Journal (subscription): High Court Cuts Punitives for Genentech [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 11:57 am
[Oct. 8]Reuters made it appear that Glaxo had carried the ball, rather than noting that Tafas was there first:During the Bush administration, the Patent Office had set rules aimed at limiting the size of patent applications in hopes of reducing the time it takes to grant or reject a patent, now at about three years.But Glaxo and other companies objected and sued the office seeking that the rules be overturned.Reuters also wrote:The rules had been designed to force companies to submit… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:26 am
Eriq Gardner Some entertainment and media legal news that doesn't include Charlie Sheenread more [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
I was a guest on this episode, together with Niall Ferguson and John Cochrane (moderated by Bill Whalen), discussing Students for Fair Admissions (from last Term), Missouri v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 12:52 pm
All hope is not lost for class action plaintiffs in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:05 pm
Petitioner filed his brief in Smith v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:10 am
Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 9:28 am
Case citation: Alexander v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 2:05 am
Now, in Baker v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 6:52 am
End-of-semester craziness has dashed my hopes to compare beat reporters' takes on yesterday's arguments in the latest Gitmo-detainee-rights case, Boumediene v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:31 pm
Yesterday the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in Ice TV Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd, bringing to an end legal proceedings that have been going on for the past three years. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 4:15 am
Prince and continuing in 2018 with Rentmeester v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:56 pm
Panetta (to which I hope to add some thoughts of my own later tonight), I wanted to flag another very important, but less well-noticed development: The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces’ decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 5:12 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:03 am
In yet another case arising from Operation Durango (a government-run sting that lured hopeful immigrants into "bribing" brokers), the court had sympathy for the applicant who fell for the sting operation, but the court faulted the lawyer's inadequate development of legal theories to challenge the sting and referred the matter to the state bar. [read post]
