Search for: "In Re Bd" Results 441 - 460 of 801
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
BANKUPTCY COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBankruptcy Finance Firm Can Recover $12 Million; Loan Repayment Release Constructive Fraudulent Transfer by Debtor In re: Teligent Inc. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Lynn Foley
Jeremy Ford, BD & Marketing Operations Director – White & Case LLP   And as for my personal prediction? [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 11:51 am
Environmentalists asked the EPA's Environmental Appeals Board to reverse the issuance of the permit, and, the Board having refused, In re Prairie State Generating Co., No. 05-05 (EAB Aug. 24, 2006), they renew the quarrel in this court. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Hammerstrom Most of what Benesch has done is both innovative and rooted in BD. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 7:02 am by Dennis Crouch
It is interesting that Judge O'Malley's first patent opinion is a dissent to an en banc re-hearing that is joined by Judge Newman. [read post]
11 May 2016, 5:45 pm by Patricia Salkin
Zoning Hearing Bd. of the Township of Rostraver, 132 A.3d 1040 (PA Commwlth 1/7/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Non-Conforming Uses [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:23 am by Bill Araiza
  But I'm not sure Justice Brennan ever re-engaged. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
., Bd. of Trs. of the Leland Stanford Junior Univ. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 10:29 am by Eugene Volokh
State Bd. of Law Examiners, decided today by Judge John Cronan (S.D.N.Y.): This case concerns Defendant New York State Board of Law Examiner's refusal to grant an aspiring lawyer extra time on the New York Law Examination (NYLE) and the Uniform Bar Examination. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 3:54 am by SHG
Monroe County Bd. of Ed. test of “severe, pervasive and objectively offensive” is in the process of being changed by DoE OCR back to “severe or pervasive. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 2:11 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLC
The ZBA denied the variance as to the remaining undeveloped acreage ‘without prejudice with the right . . . to re-apply with a more detailed plan at a future time. [read post]