Search for: "In Re Opinion of Supreme Court, Etc."
Results 441 - 460
of 997
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2015, 11:52 am
Court had nothing to say to those arguments. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:58 pm
The US Supreme Court decided a case called J.D.B. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:32 pm
The Supreme Court dissent might suggest there aren't any.As to the recently-decided Supreme Court case in Teva v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
The findings of the court necessarily had to argue that a Declaration of Independence was a) a legal document, b) capable of superseding the supreme law of a state and c) that this interpretation had precedent in other countries (France, Germany, Hungary, South Africa, etc.). [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
In re J.N., Jr., 406 A.2d 1275, 1283 (D.C. 1979). [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
The Supreme Court has expressly said so. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 10:21 am
And in Canada, the legal profession won: the Canadian Supreme Court ruled that such copying was fair dealing. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:06 am
This point was reiterated by several of the judges on the Supreme Court multiple times. [read post]
Oracle effectively says Google jumped gun with Supreme Court petition in Android-Java copyright case
9 Dec 2014, 3:36 am
The very last section argues that Google's interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court was premature. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
This seems to suggest that a room that would be capable of being used as a bedroom by an overnight carer (for non-full time use, etc.) would be a bedroom for the purposes of Reg B13, whether or not there was any need for an overnight carer. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 10:21 am
Appellant argues that the law in the Ninth Circuit is X but that an intervening Supreme Court decision holds Y, so Y's the law, not X. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:05 am
At this point, we finally get to the proceeding that has ended up in the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
EPA, a case from last term in which the Supreme Court confronted another large, complex, and at times difficult-to-parse statute: the Clean Air Act. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:18 am
Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States: A General Approach, 2014. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:29 pm
The most recent was the Ninth Court of Appeals (see the opinion). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:27 am
(c ) The “Three Supremes” (三个至上) long associated with former Supreme People’s Court president Wang Shengjun (a man on whose CV not a single day of legal education appears), are resurrected in the same section. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
He liked to say that you’re entitled to your own opinion, but not to your own facts. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
The courts that do require subjective intent often rely on the Supreme Court’s 2003 ruling in Virginia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am
” (1) Whether this is a question of law or of fact for a jury is the subject of a split (one that the Supreme Court is set to resolve). [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:31 pm
The authority for this is the Supreme Court’s holding in Nobelman v. [read post]
