Search for: "In re Application of Johns" Results 441 - 460 of 6,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 2:02 am by John L. Welch
In re Good Sports Inc., Serial No. 77738935 (July 20, 2011) [not precedential].Being a good sport, Applicant did not dispute that the involved goods are related. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 7:00 am
In the words of the CCPA: 'Direct association is the minimum it must show.'"Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 May 2008, 4:30 am
" The key to these registrations is that the variable element has a limited number of possibilities.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
10 May 2018, 3:18 am
" This requires consideration of how the designation is actually used in the marketplace.The Board found the opinion in In re APO LLC to be instructive. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:43 am
[The Board also denied applicant's motion based on issue preclusion (or collateral estoppel) because the district court ruling was not a final judgment but rather a post-judgment ruling on a motion to reopen proceedings.]Read comments and post your comment hereTTABlog note: I've yet to see a successful Morehouse defense.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 10:00 am
Distinguishing In re Valenite Inc., 84 USPQ2d 1346 (TTAB 2007), the Board found Applicant U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
The inspiration for today’s post comes from my buddy, John Baldino, who tweeted this yesterday: (By the way, if you’re in HR and you’re not following John on Twitter, then you need to fix that). [read post]