Search for: "In re First Judicial Cir."
Results 441 - 460
of 1,564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
The 11th Circuit based the order on its previous (unpublished) decision in In re McNeal, No. 11-11352 (11th Cir. 5/11/12), in which the circuit limited the Supreme Court’s decision in Dewsnup v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 2:04 pm
(In re Application to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings), 939 F.3d 710, 714 (6th Cir. 2019), and the Fourth Circuit agreed, Servotronics, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 9:19 am
Cir. 1983) and United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:46 am
Bandza correctly identifies some of the bases for judicial hostility to re-analyses. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 2:51 pm
Park,__ F.3d __, 2011 WL 2418906 (9th Cir. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
First, as to the Equal Protection Clause: Plaintiff claims that Detective Rick's alleged racial bias against her clouded his investigation. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
None of the citations in the first paragraph have anything to do with warning letters. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:06 pm
” We’re sticking to that. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 8:18 pm
Ct. (9th Cir. 1998) ("transcripts of hearings conducted during jury deliberations in a criminal trial"), cited approvingly by In re Hearst Newspapers, LLC (5th Cir. 2011). [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation, 768 F.3d 1245 (10th Cir. 2014). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
Finally, if you’re a tax junkie or just a fan of George Harrison circa 1966, get ready to be excited. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 4:31 pm
Holder, Jr., 8th Cir. (10/14/14)Immigration LawPetitioner, a native of Hong Kong, petitioned for review of the BIA’s affirmance of the IJ’s denial of withholding of removal. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:15 pm
Cir. 1990). [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Apotex, Inc., 521 F.3d 253 (3d Cir. 2008). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:14 am
Note that the Board took judicial notices of a definition of "mocha. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:58 am
Slater (9th Cir. 2018); see also Kelley v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:49 pm
Cir. 2005) (deeming the question of whether statute requires intent to deceive public "virtually an issue of first impression"). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 7:15 pm
This is a judicial oversight. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
The great majority of these cases get the back of the judicial hand. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
App’x 371, 381 (6th Cir. 2001); Nelson v. [read post]
