Search for: "In re Judge Russell" Results 441 - 460 of 785
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2014, 11:27 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
Clarke's Mysterious WorldRoxy Music – AvalonLangston Hughes – Ballad of the GypsySerge Gainsbourg – BaudelaireDavid Linx – Becoming StreamsThe Divine Comedy – Bernice Bobs Her HairBon Iver – Beth/Rest - Rare Book RoomJay Farrar – Big SurMorrissey – Billy BuddThe Decemberists – Billy LiarSmooth Toad – Bixby CanyonDeath Cab for Cutie – Bixby Canyon BridgeBilly Bragg – Blake's JerusalemBlossom Dearie –… [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 11:27 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
Clarke's Mysterious WorldRoxy Music – AvalonLangston Hughes – Ballad of the GypsySerge Gainsbourg – BaudelaireDavid Linx – Becoming StreamsThe Divine Comedy – Bernice Bobs Her HairBon Iver – Beth/Rest - Rare Book RoomJay Farrar – Big SurMorrissey – Billy BuddThe Decemberists – Billy LiarSmooth Toad – Bixby CanyonDeath Cab for Cutie – Bixby Canyon BridgeBilly Bragg – Blake's JerusalemBlossom Dearie –… [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 11:27 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
Clarke's Mysterious WorldRoxy Music – AvalonLangston Hughes – Ballad of the GypsySerge Gainsbourg – BaudelaireDavid Linx – Becoming StreamsThe Divine Comedy – Bernice Bobs Her HairBon Iver – Beth/Rest - Rare Book RoomJay Farrar – Big SurMorrissey – Billy BuddThe Decemberists – Billy LiarSmooth Toad – Bixby CanyonDeath Cab for Cutie – Bixby Canyon BridgeBilly Bragg – Blake's JerusalemBlossom Dearie –… [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
After that, you’ll temporarily have to go elsewhere if you’re looking for an endless series of disappointments. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:57 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The court in MDL 1935, In re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation, used Rule 58(b) in this way. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Austin 14-271Issue: Whether a reviewing court may presume that a trial judge acted “vindictively” in giving a defendant a higher sentence after resentencing, when no higher court had vacated the trial judge's original sentence. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:29 pm
Jeremy gives the floor to Nick Briggs and Kerry Russell (Shakespeares), who report on 118 Data Resource Limited v IDS Data Services Limited and others [2014] EWHC 3629 (Ch), a High Court, England and Wales, ruling of Deputy Judge David Halpern QC, in which they represented the defendants. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 1:36 pm
Nick Briggs and Kerry Russell (of Shakespeares, solicitors) offer us a great example here with this note on audit clauses in IP licences. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
With what’s left of Thanksgiving coming up, we are obligated as denizens of the Internet to do a post on things we’re thankful for. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:38 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Russell, 86 U.S. 433, 466 (1873) (same). (...)Since the creation of this court in 1982, we have addressedIndustrial Chemicals and the original patentrequirement on four occasions: In re Hounsfield, 699 F.2d1320 (Fed. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the relationship between circuit precedent and qualified immunity in the wake of last week’s summary reversal in Carroll v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
The Eleventh Circuit abided the stripping (as some judges are wont to do). [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:00 am by Ronald Collins
He liked to say that you’re entitled to your own opinion, but not to your own facts. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
You’ll be as happy as we are that we’re done with Relist Watch until November. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 11:59 pm by Cecilia Marcela Bailliet
The re-submission of works which have already been considered for this prize is not allowed. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
” These are not technically relists, but they’re worth brief comment anyway. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
,” you’re right. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
AstenJohnson, Inc. 13-1252Issue: Whether, in a federal jury case, a district judge's procedural failure to make detailed findings under Daubert v. [read post]