Search for: "In re Means"
Results 441 - 460
of 89,586
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2024, 9:30 am
Just as I thought they would, the Oregon Supreme Court has ruled that Measure 113 doesn't mean what it says, but rather what the voters thought they were voting on when they passed it. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:24 am
” its plain meaning and import. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 12:35 pm
Finally, our home region has commenced the post-Covid re-opening process. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:45 am
The post What the Brexit Means for Copyright appeared first on Plagiarism Today. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:42 pm
So what exactly does this non-compete-clause mean for you? [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:42 pm
So what exactly does this non-compete-clause mean for you? [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
The post Is Joint Ownership An Effective Means Of Avoiding Probate? [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 10:30 am
Accordingly, applicants should not rely on the fact that the words comprising their marks may have other meaning that are non-descriptive when the words also have meanings that are descriptive in trying to avoid a descriptiveness refusal. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:58 am
“We hold that such re-registration is not a ‘registration’ within the meaning of § 1125(d)(1). [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 12:36 am
The firm is re-announcing the recall of these dangerous products because only two percent of the 98,000 consumers who purchased these units have received a free repair, which means that consumers and their property remain at serious risk. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 3:10 am
The back story is so goofy as to be the stuff of legend, but that doesn’t mean things can’t get worse. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:55 pm
Korten’s become the predominant social meaning of “corporate governance. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:11 am
In re Aqua (Fed. [read post]
20 May 2020, 7:08 am
For those members of the United States Senate that are intent on fashioning some degree of immunity for businesses that are re-opening, a bill that includes direction or incentives to insurers to provide coverage – which may be at odds with what the insurers bargained for in particular polices — may ultimately be a means that is at least somewhat less fraught with legislative peril. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:06 pm
“After a five-year fight, we’re pleased to see the USDA stepping up to stop the cheaters picking the pockets of America’s farmers and ranchers. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 7:47 am
"); see also In re Geisler, 116 F.3d 1465, 1470 (Fed. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm
You're not going to win that one. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 4:24 am
" ]See prior IPBiz post IN RE ROBERT SKVORECZ: confusion over comprising? [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
All due care required by the circumstances means appropriate conduct by the Appellant and its representatives. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 12:06 pm
It's Queer Theory and I don't mean homosexual. [read post]