Search for: "In re William H."
Results 441 - 460
of 957
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Titus, William J. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
Judith Kelleher Schafer[We're sorry to pass on news of the death of another important contributor to American legal history.]Judith Kelleher Schafer obtained a BA from H. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The primary track is the “official business, or topics of discourse”—the substance of what we want to say.12 A secondary, or collateral, track refers to the act of speaking itself: “to timing, delays, re-phrasings, mistakes, repairs, intentions to speak, and the like. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
HENRY H. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
The shooting occurred in the Louis H. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
And, after a really long break, we're back. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
How much money was Howard Hughes accused of giving to the Nixon re-election campaign? [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Given Selikoff’s reputation and prestige in the field of asbestos health effects, and his role in helping pass the Williams-Steiger Act of 1969, we might wonder why no one has written a full-length biography. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
H. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:19 pm
Judge William T. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
The trial court judge, William H. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:08 am
If you’re prepared, this will be easier. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
This (re)turn to the common law seems to encourage the creation of a new “mythistory” – to employ the useful coinage of the American historian William H. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
By William W. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 12:30 am
" H-Net has a timely review of Remembering the Revolution: Memory, History, and Nation Making from Independence to the Civil War edited by Michael A. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
See Williams v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
See Williams v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 8:58 am
They’re really trying to intimidate anyone else who might want to pursue similar scholarly lines of inquiry. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:00 am
H/T JAA Blog. [read post]
