Search for: "L & B Construction, Inc" Results 441 - 460 of 853
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2013, 7:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See ’494 patent col. 1 l. 7; col. 7 l. 44; col. 8 l. 65; col. 10 l. 1;col.15l.16;col.18l.52;col.19l.20;col.20l.16; col. 22l.40;col.26l.15;col.27l.36;col.30l.58. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Estate of Fred Short, d/b/a Sime Construction Co.[7] Counsel for J Pereira Fernandes SA submitted that the intent to sign was not relevant, and mentioned Elpis Maritime Co. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
   Criminal law might be understood as teaching statutory application and construction skills. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm by Law Lady
The court concluded that 30 U.S.C. 932(l), as amended by section 1556(b) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
 WildTangent then moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
May 31, 2013) Kelly-Brown owns a motivational services business, Own Your Power Communications, Inc., that holds events and puts out publications under the registered service mark “Own Your Power,” which promote the concept of “owning” one’s power. [read post]
14 May 2013, 9:48 am
The dispute in Fitness Holdings concerned a constructively fraudulent transfer claim under section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code, seeking to undo certain pre-bankruptcy transfers made in payment of a purported loan. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:48 am by Sheppard Mullin
The dispute in Fitness Holdings concerned a constructively fraudulent transfer claim under section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code, seeking to undo certain pre-bankruptcy transfers made in payment of a purported loan. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2013) (noting a party may not object to a claim construc- tion it proposed or agreed to); Lazare Kaplan Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
  K-Tech appealed the dismissal two weeks before the Federal Circuit issued its decision in R+L Carriers, Inc. v. [read post]