Search for: "Lack v State"
Results 441 - 460
of 39,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2012, 8:09 pm
Proposition 8 State lacks rational basis For gay marriage ban Opinion [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
On Tuesday, January 17, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
And in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm
In Wisdom v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 6:47 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
In Cathey v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:35 am
Earlier this month, the Court granted review of Hughes v.... [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:58 pm
We have jurisdiction to determine our own jurisdiction, Special Invs., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 12:09 pm
The Court recently ordered this case remanded to state court for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:43 pm
Did the administrative law judge err when he dismissed the appellants’ Favoritism Grievance for lack of standing? [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:41 am
In examining the plaintiff’s informational injury, the court remanded the claim to state court for a lack of standing. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The Supreme Court’s cert grant last June in Moore v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:43 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. filed Mar. 9, 2009) on the motion of the California Attorney General, and has done so on narrow, procedural grounds, without reaching the merits of the due process and equal-protection claims:As Plaintiffs' marriage is valid within California, they cannot present an injury with respect to the recognition of their marriage by the State of California under Lujan [v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:06 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
On Friday, in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 8:55 am
On Tuesday in McGuinness v New York State Workers' Compensation Bd., 2007 NY Slip Op 05236, the Second Department held that the Court of Claims lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review determinations of the State Worker's Compensation Board. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 5:00 pm
In Thole v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 10:11 am
Facts: This case (Gonzalez-Arroyo v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 11:07 am
The district court dismissed the petitions for review, holding Petitioners lacked standing to pursue their claims. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:21 am
" Sandisk Corporation v. [read post]
