Search for: "MATTER OF M W" Results 441 - 460 of 3,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2022, 8:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The M/Y Johanny, 36 F.3d 136, 141 n.6 (1st Cir. 1994) (quoting James W. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
[As I’m writing about in more detail, it’s weird that, more than 75 years after the Lanham Act was enacted, courts are not willing to tell us whether its scope matches or exceeds that of commercial speech.] [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:26 pm by Josh Blackman
It's a main reason we have panels of three, allowing for honest differences on matters large and small. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This basic question has three different answers, all regularly used in any given jurisdiction—this is not a matter of circuit splits. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
Having considered the President's January 6 Rally Speech in its entirety and in context, the court concludes that the President's statements that, "[W]e fight. [read post]
That act specifically prohibited Nixon from destroying the tapes, and further specified that: [n]otwithstanding any other law or any agreement, the [General Services] Administrator shall receive, retain, or make reasonable efforts to obtain, complete possession and control of all papers, documents, memorandums, transcripts, and other objects and materials which constitute the Presidential historical materials of Richard M. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 11:55 am by Roger Parloff
(“I’m Elizabeth O’Brien,” she writes, “and my goal is to get you jazzed about grammar. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:22 am by Matthias Weller
– A Critical Overview of the Hague Preliminary Draft on Judgments”, Yearbook of Private International Law 17 (2015/2016), pp 1-31 Bonomi, Andrea; Mariottini, Cristina M. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:01 am by Daphne Keller
” Perhaps as a matter of evidence law, Israeli courts could not read anything else into these platform decisions. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
ArgentinaDecision Date: August 22, 2013 The Inter-American Court of Human Rights did not hold Argentina responsible for the violation of the right to freedom of expression in respect of Carlos and Pablo Mémoli. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 4:56 pm by Rick Klau
“[W]hat’s past is prologue, what to comeIn yours and my discharge. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:21 am by Joe Mullin
  Cindy: I'm Cindy Cohn, EFFs executive director,  Danny: And I'm Danny. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 10:47 am by Will Baude
Christakis, Sterling Professor of Social and Natural Science, Yale University Richard W. [read post]