Search for: "MATTER OF RULES ON DISQUALIFICATION"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2021, 6:15 am
The private market gating rules’ pernicious effects go far beyond the individual, Peirce said. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:32 am
Commonly referred to as the "advocate-witness" rule, Rule 3.7(a) states: A lawyer shall not act as advocate before a tribunal in a matter in which the lawyer is likely to be a witness on a significant issue of fact unless: (1) the testimony relates solely to an uncontested issue; (2) the testimony relates solely to the nature and value of legal services rendered in the matter; (3) disqualification of the lawyer would work substantial hardship on… [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:27 pm
Proposed Comment 8 to Rule 1.07 says lawyers must make several “determinations” before agreeing to represent multiple clients in a case or matter. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Carney ruled that an ethics screen does not prevent a firm's imputed disqualification when a lawyer in the firm has key confidential information from work at another firm. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:17 pm
While those bringing the allegations argued the conflicts were legitimate, the special master removed herself before a judge could rule on the matter. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 7:06 am
From the article: The [Wisconsin Supreme Court] rule requires that judges disqualify themselves from any case when "a judge has a significant financial or personal interest in the outcome of the matter. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 7:30 am
Thus, the ALJ found that the representation of CSP in a matter adverse to Süd-Chemie did not present an ethical conflict. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 7:39 am
It does not matter whether the violation was minor or major. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
My point is not a matter solely of removal. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:31 pm
How does this ruling impact civil trial lawyers? [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 8:13 pm
Among other things, the proposed rule would: Set a 7 percent hiring goal for the employment of individuals with disabilities, the highest level ever; Require enhanced documentation and recordkeeping of requests and processing of requests for reasonable accommodation and other matters; Provide for annual self-reviews of employers’ recruitment and outreach efforts; and Add a new requirement for contractors to list job openings to increase their pools of qualified applicants. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:22 am
To justify disqualification, the Court must find that allowing the representation to continue would threaten the fair and efficient administration of justice, a threat that is greatly reduced by a credible representation to the Court that the firm will ensure that the attorneys working on this matter do not have access to Dow’s client confidences. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:02 am
Nevertheless, the trial court ruled disqualification was not an appropriate sanction because counsel’s rule violations were not intentional. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
Accordingly, dismissal of the complaint and disqualification of FLPA did not significantly impair the federal interests embodied in the FCA. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:00 am
In his explanation of his disqualification ruling, Judge Nottingham articulated a contempt for expert economic evidence that raises serious questions about any exercise of his discretion in this matter. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
These cases played a starring role in the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Perry v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" However the Circuit Court concluded that the issue need not be addressed within the ambit of Plaintiff's appeal because the answer would not affect its decision to affirm the District Court's ruling. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
" However the Circuit Court concluded that the issue need not be addressed within the ambit of Plaintiff's appeal because the answer would not affect its decision to affirm the District Court's ruling. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:22 am
The appellate court ruled in McGovern’s favor, for reasons I’ll mention shortly. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 3:06 pm
Here’s what the appellate court ruled: 1. [read post]
