Search for: "MINISTER v. STATE" Results 441 - 460 of 3,986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by ernst
Bid Industrial Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Strang and Another (Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development, Third Party): An AnalysisElsabe Schoeman11. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am by INFORRM
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:59 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Abdulla & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2010] EWHC 3303 (QB) (17 December 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Young v Oxford City Council [2010] EWHC 3337 (Admin) (17 December 2010) Cordant Group Plc, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills & Anor [2010] EWHC 3442 (Admin) (30 December 2010) Smout v The Welsh Ministers & Ors [2010] EWHC 3307… [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
Apotex sought to sell a generic version of NEXIUM, applying for a Notice of Compliance to the federal Minister of Health to enable it to do so. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
Apotex sought to sell a generic version of NEXIUM, applying for a Notice of Compliance to the federal Minister of Health to enable it to do so. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
About a century ago, Benito Mussolini called fascist Italy a “totalitarian state,” a concept that he defined with brilliant clarity: “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 10 provides that all documents submitted by the Requesting State shall be translated into the language of the Requested State. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V (1) Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own nationals under this Treaty but the executive authority of each Contracting Party shall have the power to deliver them up if, in its discretion, it considers that it is proper to do so. (2) For the purposes of this Article - (a) a reference to the executive authority of a Contracting Party shall, in the case of Australia, be construed as a reference to the Attorney-General of Australia; (b) Australian… [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V The requested Party shall not be bound to extradite its own nationals, but it shall have the power to extradite them in its discretion. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am by James A. Goldston
With a near unanimous bench of judges from 15 and, in some cases, 16 different national legal systems, including the United States, the Court’s opinion spoke volumes. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm by Sophia Tang
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am by Sophia Tang
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:09 am by tracey
Supreme Court Quila & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 (12 October 2011) AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 (12 October 2011) Ambrose v Harris, Procurator Fiscal, Oban (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 43 (6 October 2011) Her Majesty’s Advocate v P (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 44 (6 October 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Jones v… [read post]