Search for: "Matter of A.D"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
Govan, 268 A.D.2d 689, 691 [New York Supreme Court – Appellate Division 2000]. . . [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
It held that contrary to Matter of Barbara T. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
In Matter of Melendez, the First Department suspended Mr. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 2:55 am
& Cas., 185 A.D.2d 403, 585 N.Y.S.2d 637, 638(3rd Dept. 1992); also Matter of State Farm Ins. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
In Matter of Melendez, the First Department suspended Mr. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:07 am
Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 A.D.3d 691, 835 N.Y.S.2d 285). [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:35 pm
A.D. 2014 - 803 (C.P. [read post]
17 May 2013, 4:00 am
Venugopalan, 228 A.D.2d 767. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
”As to the penalty imposed by the arbitrator on Employee, termination, the Appellate Division modified the Supreme Court’s confirmation the arbitrator’s decision, vacating the penalty of dismissal and remanded the matter to the arbitrator “for the imposition of a lesser penalty. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:23 am
Constitution as the remarks were not made on a matter of public concern. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 7:44 am
" Justice Sciortino ultimately held:In the matter at bar, the City does not seriously dispute that it lacked notice of petitioner's claims, or the facts underlying the matter. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 7:48 pm
City of New York, 261 A.D.2d 34, 38 [1st Dept 1999]. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:32 pm
Therefore, following the holding in Matter of Krivan (32 A.D.2d 551, 299 N.Y.S.2d 931), and following the clear testamentary intent of Mrs. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 8:22 am
Stephenson, 88 A.D.3d 567, 574, 931 N.Y.S.2d 284, 289 (2011). [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:30 am
The jury resolved this credibility determination in plaintiff's favor (see Laham v Bin Chambi, 34 AD3d 374, 375, 824 N.Y.S.2d 641 [1st Dept 2006]).Based on our review of the record, defendant's request for a reduction of the compensatory damages award is without merit.Plaintiff did not object to the trial court's refusal to charge punitive damages, and therefore did not preserve the issue for review (see CPLR 4110-b; Washington v Atenco, 103 A.D.3d 529, 529, 959 N.Y.S.2d… [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:50 am
Co., 29 A.D.3d 737, 738, 815 N.Y.S.2d 248 (2d Dept. 2006). [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
Foreman, 104 A.D.3d 460, 963 N.Y.S.2d 625 (1st Dept. 2013). [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 2:32 am
While there were a number of factors in A.D. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:21 am
In Matter of Gina P. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 10:51 am
The Court declined to remit the matter to DEC for further consideration, and ordered the property admitted into the BCPbased on the extensive record supporting eligibility. [read post]
