Search for: "Matter of Howard v Howard"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2015, 5:30 pm
Whether or not I/Land actually was negligent is a matter for trial. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:19 pm
"--Chief Justice Roberts to Howard Srebnick when the CJ was asking how a district court is to determine how much money should be used for a fee.I was able to travel to D.C. to sit in the Supreme Court and watch Howard make his argument in Luis v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:04 am
Cohen v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 8:13 am
Additional Resources: A judge throws out a challenge to how unions spend teachers’ money, September 30, 2015, Los Angeles Times, by Howard Blume More Blog Entries: Allen v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 2:51 am
First up was OBB Personenverkehr v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Howard (Oklahoma); Marmet Health Care Center v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
Moreover, it is unlikely that Marshall believed as a general matter that the meaning of the Constitution could change. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:22 am
Griffith, Deceased v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:26 pm
Hat tip: Howard Bashman. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:56 am
Griffith, Deceased v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
Comment The Supreme Court’s decision has been welcomed by The Howard League for Penal Reform, which intervened in the case as a neutral party to provide expert evidence. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 4:20 am
": (Ray Charles Foundation v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
In Alfred v Safir, 283 AD2d 280, the disciplinary penalty to be imposed agreed upon by the employee and employer’s representative was made part of the record by the disciplinary hearing officer.New York City Police Commissioner Howard Safir, suspended Gary Alfred for 30 days without pay and placed him on disciplinary probation for one year following the "settlement of disciplinary charges" filed against Alfred. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 2:20 pm
Maatman Jr. and Howard M. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
But that isn’t the end of the matter. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 8:24 pm
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003); Grutter v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:52 am
Howard Cnty., the “employee bears the burden of demonstrating that he was speaking as a citizen on a matter of public concern” and is therefore protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 12:51 pm
Maatman Jr. and Howard M. [read post]