Search for: "Matter of Wallace"
Results 441 - 460
of 925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2014, 6:27 pm
Keays, [56] … The normal distress and hurt feelings resulting from dismissal are not compensable. [57] Damages resulting from the manner of dismissal must then be available only if they result from the circumstances described in Wallace, namely where the employer engages in conduct during the course of dismissal that is “unfair or is in bad faith by being, for example, untruthful, misleading or unduly insensitive” (para. 98). [read post]
24 May 2014, 11:27 am
In Wallace v. [read post]
24 May 2014, 11:27 am
In Wallace v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:35 pm
It wouldn't matter whether or not Exum was Jones' biological daughter. [read post]
21 May 2014, 9:01 pm
” Again, I view these as simply a matter of asserting his conservative bona fides.) [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:30 pm
Federal Judge Strikes Down Pennsylvania Same-Sex Marriage Ban – Harrisburg lawyer Lee Tankle of McNees Wallace & Nurick on the firm’s Pennsylvania Labor & Employment Blog Oklahoma Joins the Patent Troll Hunt – Jacob Martinez and Tod Melgar of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives Cybersecurity Securities Class Actions are Coming: Predictions, Analysis, and Practical Guidance – Seattle attorney Douglas Greene of Lane Powell on the… [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
But don’t get carried away with such peripheral matters: your real job is to make the most out of the case-law. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:01 pm
” That same case, Wallace v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 10:14 am
Delicath, Deputy Attorney General; and Caitlin Wallace, Assistant Attorney General.Date of Decision: May 7, 2014Facts: Mark Hitz was placed on probation for a felony larceny conviction, subject to placement in an adult community correctional facility. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:29 pm
This year’s problem involved issues of subject matter eligibility of claims relating to DNA and of subject matter jurisdiction over a licensing dispute. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 5:58 am
Wallace, 565 S.E.2d 386 (W. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:01 pm
Wallace (1939) shows, there’s no special non-delegation doctrine for when the delegates are private, and why Carter v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
Accordingly, if all three had the shared intent to murder, it would not matter who actually pulled the trigger; all three defendants could be convicted of first-degree murder. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:52 pm
Numerous patents are litigated the world over without the public taking notice, and the vast majority of them would be too esoteric for a large audience. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:26 am
Today the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court just decided, in Holmes v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 12:14 pm
“The letter to Wallace did that. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 12:14 pm
“The letter to Wallace did that. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:53 pm
Tanke, No. 12-10362 (3-3-14 )(Fisher with Berzon; Wallace concurring). [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
More fundamentally, talk about public-private parallelism is somewhat ambiguous, because the public and private sectors work differently as an empirical matter. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:28 am
Carter, No. 12-10549 (2-7-14)(Per curiam with Wallace and Berzon; dissent by Zouhary, D.J.). [read post]
