Search for: "Matter of Will of Cooley" Results 441 - 460 of 466
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2019, 3:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A July 12, 2019 post on the Cooley law firm’s PubCo blog about the ruling can be found here. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Robin Sessions Cooley, Deputy Attorney General.Date of Decision: March 3, 2008Issues: Whether the district court abused its discretion by admitting uncharged misconduct evidence. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Robin Sessions Cooley, Deputy Attorney General.Date of Decision: March 3, 2008Issues: Whether the district court abused its discretion by admitting uncharged misconduct evidence. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:11 am by Ashley Gorski
As a matter of U.S. government policy, people generally do not receive notice of this surveillance, even after the surveillance has ended and even where notice would not jeopardize an active investigation. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 9:02 pm by Cary Coglianese
Leadership matters, and in times of crisis, leadership almost surely matters more than anything else. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:41 am by Emma Snell
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Sharon D. Nelson and John W. Simek
ABA RESOLUTION 105 The ABA House of Delegates adopted Resolution 105 at the 2018 ABA Midyear Meeting. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:22 pm by Ken Shigley
This prudence is “a virtue of decision making that brings together thoughtfulness, experience and analytical reasoning with empathy and humanity,” necessary to maintain a balance between sympathy and commitment to the client or matter at hand and loyalty to larger social and ethical imperatives.[6] By increasing the likelihood that choices are made with thoughtfulness, analysis and empathy, prudence reduces the likelihood of regret.[7] Prudence includes the analysis of all… [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 5:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Another reason some have suggested why the Court has taken up fewer cases it that the Justices were reluctant to take up controversial matters that, with the vacancy, might have resulted in a 4-4 split. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 1:39 pm by Rick
Cooley, writing A Treatise on the Constitutional Limitations in 1868, at page 356. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:20 am by Adam Thierer
The fact of the matter is that online verification is hard, even the parental consent variety. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am by John Mikhail
  Schwartz’s careful analysis of the many subtle lines of constitutional argument flowing from McCulloch through Gibbons, Miln, Cooley, Dewitt, and The Legal Tender Cases, and the rest of the nineteenth-century commerce power canon, is likewise brilliant and penetrating, and it has taught me a great deal I did not know or fully appreciate about these cases. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
Justice Carroll dissents, reasoning that these are not matters to determine on summary judgment and that the record needs further development. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 9:31 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
  Not surprisingly, the preferred places to work as a summer associate were Kirkland & Ellis (the new #1), Latham, Cooley, Skadden, and Sidley Austin. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  In litigating scientific issues, lawyers and judges will necessarily have to engage with substantive matters. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
New York,3 that the Supreme Court matter-of-factly held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was “of course” applicable to the states.4 To justify incorporation, Penn Central cited only one 19th century case, which itself did not mention the Fifth Amendment.5 Before Penn Central, the Court relied on the Due Process Clause to restrict the scope of state taking power. [read post]