Search for: "Minie v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2012, 2:28 pm by Leanne Buckley-Thomson
Mr Justice Eder held that the correct approach was that the present legislation is presumed valid but, as stated by Lord Goff in Kirklees BC v Wickes Building Supplies Ltd [1993] AC 227, the existence of the alleged defence is to be taken into account in the exercise of the court’s discretion [paragraph 78]. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 6:53 am by Joy Waltemath
Soon thereafter, she purportedly suffered a mini-stroke and as a result, missed multiple days of work, for which she received a counseling letter. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 1:29 pm by Norman Gregory Fernandez
The voltage on your motorcycle is 12 V DC, whereas a standard USB mini plug uses 5 V DC with much less current than the motorcycle puts out. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:46 am by Erika Bachiochi
It’s the proper role of the legislature, as recognized in Gonzales v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Last, you may want to consider the Second Circuit’s decision in Republic of Ecuador v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 10:05 am by David Klein
Last month, a magistrate judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida issued an informative report and recommendation in Zononi v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 5:03 am by Adriana S. Kosovych
A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 2:23 pm
And what of the marvel of the mini-antennas? [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25 (1989) (noting and accepting the government’s concession on this score); United States v. [read post]