Search for: "Mitchell v. People" Results 441 - 460 of 707
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2012, 12:22 pm
Mitchell, 652 F.3d 387 (CA3 2011), cert. denied, 566 U.S. ___ (2012); Haskell v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:30 am by Michael Scutt
Ideally that selection criteria should be objective and non-discriminatory as possible, although previous case law (Mitchells of Lancaster (Brewers)Ltd v Tattersall) has held that using non-objective criteria is not fatal to a redundancy selection exercise, provided the criteria is used fairly. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 1:31 am by tekEditor
Some people don't like Lisp syntax, but it has several major technical advantages over its competitors. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:45 am by Susan Brenner
Pandelos and three other `victims’, David Cotton, Mitchell Bender and Richard Smith, testified. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:45 am by Jeanne Long
On June 22, the Court also decided People v Henix, No 144531. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:18 pm by Shawn Wright
   In most people facing this type of situation, these exceptions can be avoided by simply waiting a longer period of time before filing their bankruptcy case. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm by Pace Law School Library
Land seizures in the People’s Republic of China: protecting property while encouraging economic development. 22 Pac. [read post]