Search for: "Mitchell v. the People"
Results 441 - 460
of 621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2025, 7:47 pm
Garland and Firebaugh v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
To my surprise, although a few people had written about it, see, e.g., Kenneth Duval, Burdens of Proof and Qualified Immunity, 37 S. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
We draw attention to the following from the Media Communications List 19 July 2019,ARN v OSD, Nicklin J 18 July 2019, JKL v VBN, Garnham J Last Week in the Courts On 22 July 2019 Warby J hear a default judgment application in the case of Advertising Standards Authority v Mitchell, handing down judgment the same day [2019] EWHC 1958 (QB). [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Supreme Court, January 22, 2008 Ali v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
Electronic Communication Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:40 am
Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:57 am
The case is Julie Gallagher v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 2:08 am
In a letter no doubt inspired by the phraseology of the Court of Justice of the European Union in L'Oréal v Bellure (see post here and earlier posts from the IPKat), the letter from law firm Mishcon de Reya accuses The Icecreamists of "taking unfair advantage of, and riding on the coattails of" Lady Gaga's trade marks in a manner that is "deliberately provocative and, to many people, nausea-inducing". [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:09 am
Other excellent trial lawyers, including Jim Mitchell, also helped obtain Sarah’s verdict. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 8:35 pm
In that case, EEOC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Mitchell). [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
I have defended detainees at the base since shortly after they arrived and was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
Our Supreme Court has not yet opined on AI, but in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm
Karlo v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
A judge has barred journalists from naming four people mounting a fresh High Court Brexit challenge in reports on the case. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
Medtronic, Inc., 231 F.3d 216 (6th Cir. 2000); Mitchell v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
For each symposium, the date assigned is the date of the last in the series of posts.Many thanks to all of the people who've written for us over the years. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Consider the 2001 SCOTUS case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
Canada In the case of The College of Pharmacists of Manitoba v Jorgenson 2019 MBQB 87 Rempel J ordered a Winnipeg pharmacists to pay $150,000 in damages to his regulatory body which he accused of covering up the deaths of 24 indigenous people. [read post]
