Search for: "Mobile Productivity, LLC" Results 441 - 460 of 874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Baker of Wilson Elser on the firm’s blog, Product Liability Advocate California Gender Pay Equality Bill To Be Strictest In Nation? [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark is President of John Reed Stark Consulting LLC, a data breach response and digital compliance firm. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 5:50 am
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC ("Mobile") filed a patent infringement action against LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am by SHG
Mobil Oil Corp., 7 NY3d 434, 446-47 (2006), quoting People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 3:05 am
[Answer in first comment].In re IBrand Accessories LLC, Serial No. 86185362 (June 29, 2015) [not precedential] [Refusal to register BULLETPROOF SCREEN PROTECTOR for "display screen protectors for providing shade and privacy specially adapted to electronic devices, namely, laptops, cell phones, and personal digital assistants" [SCREEN PROTECTOR disclaimed], in view of the registered mark BULLET-PROOF SHIELDS for "protective sheet for covering laptop computers, MP3 players,… [read post]
  First, the victim, Motorola Mobility, LLC (“Motorola”), asked the Court to review the Seventh Circuit’s ruling that the FTAIA barred claims by Motorola’s foreign subsidiaries for some $3.5 billion in damages they allegedly suffered after purchasing price-fixed LCD panels overseas for inclusion in products to be sold here in the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:31 am by Daily Record Staff
SALISBURY — Revtek, LLC and Clearbox LLC announced Monday the companies are integrating their flagship products. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Motorola Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 3:26 pm by James Galvin
The issuer is not required to maintain a secondary market, and, like most structured products, there may be no buyer if the investor needed to liquidate the RCN prior to maturity. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:33 am by Eric Mills and Joshua Davey
  The backdrop to this concern is the Supreme Court’s decision in 2011 in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  “While statements that a product is better than the competition are typically deemed to be nonactionable puffery, statements as to the comparative safety of a product are specific and measurable, and thus frequently considered actionable. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
” Recall that in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]