Search for: "Murphy v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 1,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2011, 5:29 am by Rosalind English
Updated |NS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Principles of Community law) [2011] EUECJ C-493/10 (22 September 2011) - read opinion The Common European Asylum System was designed to establish a fair and effective distribution of the burden on the asylum systems of the EU Member States. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:22 am by Josh Glazov
This chart helps me keep track: Dead Alive Case Circuit Affected States Year Case Circuit Affected States Year Murphy v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:43 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Careful and appropriate use of criminal history information is an important, and in many cases essential, part of the employment process of employers throughout the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
In Giaimo, the trial court adopted the hearing officer’s recommendation to apply a so-called “Murphy discount” — named after Murphy v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:45 am by hjmarcus
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether stock options are taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act, and Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
• Policy considerations and implications in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 10:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Potential for Tribal Control of Sports Gambling After Murphy v. [read post]