Search for: "New York v. Connecticut"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,712
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm
Therefore, employers subject to Title VII, particularly those in the Second Circuit (i.e., Connecticut, New York and Vermont), should know about this opinion and consider how and whether it may apply to them. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:04 pm
Canada (Attorney General) Fair Dealing Support for News Reporting and Public Debate: The Case of Warman and National Post v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 10:38 am
Additional Resources: Zarda v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 3:09 pm
On February 26, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which has jurisdiction over Vermont, New York and Connecticut, ruled that discrimination based on sexual orientation can be sex discrimination. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 11:26 am
” Employers operating within the Second Circuit – comprising New York, Connecticut, and Vermont – already should have in place policies prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination because those state laws expressly prohibit such conduct. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 8:25 am
Connecticut is in that federal circuit (along with New York and Vermont). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
Altitude Express, makes clear that employees working within the Second Circuit (New York, Connecticut and Vermont) have access to the remedial measures and administrative process under Title VII, a federal law. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
Photo by Matias Rengel on Unsplash Yesterday, the 2nd Circuit federal court of appeals (which covers New York, Connecticut, and Vermont) held that “Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation as discrimination ‘because of … sex. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
Photo by Matias Rengel on Unsplash Yesterday, the 2nd Circuit federal court of appeals (which covers New York, Connecticut, and Vermont) held that “Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation as discrimination ‘because of … sex. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
” The states of New York, Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Mexico, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Washington, and the District of Columbia: The states and Washington, D.C., argue that agency fees “are important to maintaining the labor-management model that many states rely on to ensure the effective and efficient… [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
” The states of New York, Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Mexico, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Washington, and the District of Columbia: The states and Washington, D.C., argue that agency fees “are important to maintaining the labor-management model that many states rely on to ensure the effective and efficient… [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:17 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 11:04 am
(Byrne v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
(Byrne v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:46 am
" New York Times v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
LEXIS 15732 (ND NY, Jan. 31, 2018), a New York federal district court issued a preliminary injunction allowing a Muslim inmate to engage in individual demonstrable prayer during outdoor recreation, but denied a preliminary injunction as to group prayer.In Pouncil v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 1:42 pm
., v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:55 am
New York has a statute barring retaliation for off-duty recreational activities. [read post]
