Search for: "Nichols v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2012, 9:14 pm
The concept of eminent domain came to the forefront in 2005 when the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Kelo v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 2:05 am
Don Nichols, D2011-0086 (WIPO March 31, 2011). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:00 pm
” A class of plaintiffs filed Nichols v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 12:46 am
Nichols Middle School (NMS) has a dress code with a preface stating, “clothing … that causes distractions and inhibits learning is not allowed. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 10:17 am
Nichols, 551 F. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
De Niz Robles v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Andrew, 961 So. 2d 375, 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); see State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
While Article 8 may include a positive obligation on a member state to adopt measures to secure respect for private life between individuals, the state has a wide margin of appreciation as to what is required particularly where there is a balance between competing interests or Convention rights (see, for example, Evans v UK (2008) 46 EHRR 34 at [75], [77]; and see [81]) As a result, Article 8’s influence had led to the development in domestic law of a… [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:46 am
Horton, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
HOME, Link v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
Mortgage Bankers Ass’n, No. 13-1041; and Nichols v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
Mortgage Bankers Ass’n, No. 13-1041; and Nichols v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
’ ([2001] 1 AC 127, 201 per Lord Nicholls.) [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:40 pm
Nichols: St. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
Back in 2000 in the House of Lords case White v White, Lord Thorpe stated that the calculation is ‘a tool not a rule’. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
Lewis v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm
He replied that it would be permissible to state that the person had taken a car without the permission of the owner. [read post]
