Search for: "Olson v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 577
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”Finally, Olson said, “I would not rule that out, Justice Stevens. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:29 pm by David Lat
” The focus of his speech was United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm by Roberto M. Suárez
The legal, business, and scientific communities eagerly await the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bilski v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:42 pm by The Recorder
” The conference also provides networking opportunities with “judges — men and women — from all over the United States and the world. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm by Jason C. Brown
Massachusetts was the first state in the United States to allow same-sex marriage with the Goodridge v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
ACTA Meanwhile it's not as if the United States can escape similar criticism. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:03 am by Lyle Denniston
(Olson argued and won the Citizens United decision in the Supreme Court.) [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
Like all federal cases, Perry started in a District Court, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:07 am by Tuan Samahon
United States, a per curiam three-judge district court held that the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act violated the separation of powers because the statute had given the Comptroller General executive powers and Congress previously held the qualified power to remove the Comptroller for cause. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:30 am by Anna Christensen
”  And, in response to comments made by Ted Olson, who argued the case on behalf of Citizens United, following the decision, Jesse Strauss has a piece in the Huffington Post in which he discusses whether shareholders can realistically use corporate democracy to keep corporate campaign spending in check. [read post]