Search for: "P. v. Germany"
Results 441 - 460
of 578
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
P. 19(a). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:38 am
On this point the UK government had a pretty solid argument based on Behrami and Behrami v France and Saramati v France, Germany and Norway. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:45 am
By Otto Spijkers On the website of the Dutch Courts, you will find, in a few days, the English translation of the case in which the State of the Netherlands is held responsible for the death of three Muslim men after the fall of Srebrenica. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
The outbreak strain is consistent with the May-June outbreak strain in Germany. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:20 am
The Challenges of Better Lawmaking by Mireille van Eechoud, P. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:32 am
” Lermer Germany GmbH v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:58 pm
ePlus v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Parul Food Specialities (P) Ltd. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:42 pm
Michael P. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am
Parul Food Specialities (P) Ltd (Spicy IP) DIPP steps into TK arena – diplaces NBA? [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:13 pm
The Curia website brings us news of an appeal which has been lodged by Germany’s railway company Deutsche Bahn AG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) in Case T-404/09 Deutsche Bahn AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).By way of background: Deutsche Bahn AG had filed a trade mark application for registration of a figurative mark that consisted of a horizontal combination of the colours grey and red and which in… [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm
Although in Von Hannover v Germany ((2004) 40 EHRR 1) there was an element of harassment, a series of subsequent cases have found violations resulting from [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am
It was suggested that in order to establish liability a claim would have to show: (a) A reasonable expectation of privacy; and (b) The act or conduct complained of is highly offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities (See Australian Law Reform Commission, “For Your Information: Australian Privacy Law and Practice”, Report 108, May 2008, Recommendations 74-1 and 74-2, p.2584). [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
In Muhlemkamp v Blizzard, 521 F Supp 2d 1140 (E.D. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
With respect to Beebe’s point about how well the system works for an unfamiliar judge: University of Alabama Board of Trustees v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 12:38 am
Army installations in Germany, for guard hours not actually worked, the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 3:08 am
V. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:50 am
In last week's ruling of the ECJ in Case C-552/09 P Ferrero the court referred to two of its earlier decisions, C-398/07 P and C-57/08 P, decided on 7 May 2009 and 11 December 2008 respectively -- and both still unreported]. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
552/09 P, Ferrero SpA v OHIM, Tirol Milch reg.Gen.mbH, Innsbruck (Class 46) (IPKat) Mark your calendar right! [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
– FCAFC decision in Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd v Overliese (IP Whiteboard) Caribbean Carribean IP: Establishing an arbitral tribunal for the region (IP Watch) Canada Petition launched in opposition to CETA (Michael Geist) Clerical error in the Intellectual Property Office: Repligen Corp. v. [read post]
