Search for: "Patch v. Patch"
Results 441 - 460
of 995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 9:11 pm
”[v] The Cloud Security report notes that the top concerns are: General security concerns over the storage of data in the cloud; Data loss and leakage risks; Loss of control over security procedures applied day to day over the company’s data; and Lack of visibility to assure regulatory compliance. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Never too late 41 [week ending on Sunday 12 April] – Nagoya Protocol for dummies | The IPKat and his friends | Actial Farmaceutica Lda v Claudio de Simone | Article 5(5) of the EU's Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 | Article 16(3) of our beloved TRIPS | Italy v Spain in copyright enforcement online. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 10:56 am
It has been all quiet on the pharma patent front since the beginning of March (when the epic series of first instance decisions on Swiss form claims came to and end: see here, here, here and here), and so this moggy was delighted when there fell into his paws the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Novartis v Focus, Actavis, Teva [2015] EWHC 1068 (Pat).The case concerns a transdermal patch for rivastigmine, which is acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor used in the treatment… [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
She said, “The trial was called the United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:35 am
Howard Piltch et al. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:00 am
Sandra Gibbs v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Gulf Restoration Network, et al v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:02 pm
v=1R-B-BFQwng Frankly, the question (answer?) [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
In the case of Drum v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 2:50 pm
Saint v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:26 am
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:57 pm
Make sure software patches and critical updates are made in a prompt and timely fashion so that no critical patch is left uninstalled for lack of time or budget. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 5:39 pm
Zunner v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Judge Richard Gray of the Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas recently addressed the Hills and Ridges Doctrine in the case of Gamble v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
The much-awaited Supreme Court oral argument in King v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 1:34 pm
Daniel Kovera, et al., v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:07 pm
Additional Resources: Piltch v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 9:39 am
The Facts of the Case In the case, Piltch v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 12:19 pm
Carter–Wallace, Inc. v. [read post]
