Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 441 - 460
of 23,748
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2009, 6:11 am
Justice Scalia tends to irritate many people when he visits law schools. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:44 am
And Kara Bruce’s and Alex Sickler’s co-authored essay reviews the state of FDCPA litigation in chapter 13 cases in light of Midland Funding v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:34 am
[In Wooden v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:16 pm
The justices agreed to decide two other cases, both of which John Elwood covered in more detail in his Relist Watch column on Wednesday: Cantero v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:32 pm
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor had a profoundly practical approach to the law: Decisions mattered because of their impact on people. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:43 pm
In the Opinion (Grisham v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:35 am
Even though SCOTUSblog will competently cover Snyder v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
Ramos v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 6:03 pm
I get where Justice Dhanidina is coming from. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:18 am
But even that's fairly rare.But when I read this opinion by Justice Bedsworth, I was -- quite literally -- flabbergasted by how good it was. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 1:09 pm
Justice Raye ultimately reverses the sentence in this case. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 2:35 pm
The post Justice Sotomayor Needs To Re-Read <i>Marbury v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:27 am
For people like Mr. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 8:18 am
One would have thought that Justice Stevens, of all people, would appreciate this fact. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:07 am
Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997)Bowles v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 11:21 am
The post Justice Sotomayor's Statement in <i>Oritz v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 12:15 pm
(Donn Logan et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents) (Boren, J., assigned justice pro tempore)(3) S093235 People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:30 am
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the plurality, cast doubt upon the court's capacity to deliberate over race cases -- and mixed-raced people were said to be the culprits. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 1:44 pm
As Justice Aaron recognizes, that was wrong. [read post]
