Search for: "People v. Lines"
Results 441 - 460
of 11,994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Soon after he authored the lead opinion in Roe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:01 pm
Of note, agency telephone conference line numbers and access codes were held to be protected under Exemption 5’s “commercial” privilege.Farmworker Justice v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:26 am
Along this line, compare Justice Scalia's discussion of text in the Hatch-Waxman Act in Merck v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Affirming the Third Department’s holding, the Court of Appeals held that “this case is not akin to Guzman where the prospective juror confirmed that a sign language interpreter would allow him to follow the proceedings verbatim,” since in Guay, no alternative accommodations were requested or discussed (People v Guay, 18 NY3d 16, 23 [2011]).Along these lines, the Fourth Department noted that “[i]t is well established that ‘[a] juror who… [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:36 am
As Maynard re-argued on Monday, “the gender line this statute draws is an arbitrary one. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 6:56 am
Central to FCC v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:39 am
” Brookfield Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 6:42 am
Six people were killed. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 6:42 am
Six people were killed. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:07 am
Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:31 am
The Court of Appeals of Washington examined this issue in State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Paul v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:53 pm
The Spencer v Hartford case is flying silently under the radar and PR of NSSTA and all but a few blogs. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 4:17 pm
The Wall Street Journal reported last week that more union members are crossing the picket line as they deplete their savings. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:52 am
The government wants people to register their copyrights, however. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 8:10 am
Many people claim that Gnall sets forth a new bright line standard that a 15 year marriage merits permanent alimony. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Some people are arguing for bright-line rules to the effect that police can never question young people below some arbitrary cut-off age without a lawyer present, which for all practical purposes means they can't question them at all. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:38 am
Turner v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:04 am
Garcia v. [read post]
