Search for: "People v. Oliver" Results 441 - 460 of 690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2013, 4:37 pm by Ron Coleman
 These young people and their new blogs! [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 1:30 pm by David Bernstein
So to suggest that I don’t explore the role of the House of Truth is to elevate the physical space above the people who made it what it was. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am by The Charge
  Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:43 am
 In October 2011 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its ruling in the keenly-contested dispute in Case C-34/10 Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace over the patentability of human stem cells. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm by Gretchen Goetz
“The video leads with the sensational claims by Jamie Oliver and the ‘ick’ factor of the product,” he wrote. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 5:28 am by Andrew Koppelman
  They clearly are a source of law, as the plaintiffs found in Singer v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:15 pm by Old Fox
Olive-flavored mouthwash.9. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:03 am
The policy regarding surveillance of marijuana grow operations in open or public fields has been governed by the decision in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:10 pm
The BGH had to issue a final decision in the matter following the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling in Case C-34/10 Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace ( noted here and here by the IPKat) on the questions it referred to the CJEU. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 8:59 pm by JD Hull
Get in shape--so you can flirt with Holden Oliver's gorgeous young Tyrolean wife. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:00 am by LTA-Editor
The judge’s decision relied mostly on Supreme Court precedent from Oliver v. [read post]