Search for: "People v. Patrick"
Results 441 - 460
of 861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2010, 1:06 pm
The Texas v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 11:47 am
That case dealt with Frank Spisak, a neo-Nazi who killed three people in 1982.The case is Beard v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:05 am
” Hartfield v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:38 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:48 am
From Doe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
This possibility is supported by seminal work done at the beginning of last century by Professors Patrick W. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:55 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
See, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 5:57 am
As a result, the security of the American people has been needlessly and recklessly weakened. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:15 pm
Much of the discussion is centering on the impact of the 2005 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 8:00 pm
As far as confessions under U.S. law are concerned, I refer to the Fulminante decision (Arizona v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 12:16 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:38 am
First, in July, the First Department handed down their decision in People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:59 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:50 am
"See a list of ILB entries on the Court of Appeals decision in the case of Morrison v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
The provision in question, Section 1806(f) of FISA, establishes procedures for people to seek to suppress FISA evidence that will be introduced against them. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection London company Pension House Exchange (PHE) has been fined £45,000 for making more than 39,000 nuisance calls to people about their pensions. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:16 am
Here, I'm offering a different list, a shorter one, inspired by (and partly stolen from) Patrick at Popehat.Dred Scott v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:07 am
Brandon v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
