Search for: "People v. Simon" Results 441 - 460 of 743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
Simon Shiao Tam, The Slants’ founder and bassist, has explained that the band selected its name in order to “take on these stereotypes that people have about us, like the slanted eyes, and own them. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
People are forced to devise increasingly bizarre ways to express their thoughts. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:18 am
  We enjoyed the company of real "property people" during the morning and afternoon tea-breaks, the lunch break and the Cocktail Party. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Simon Singh has some interesting reflections on the case and CFAs – suggesting that CFAs should be retained to promote access to justice but with success fees reduced to 25%. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation The PCC has ruled on a new case: A Woman v Clevedon People, clauses 3 (privacy) and 14 (confidential sources). [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 1:51 pm by Nate Russell
Wikipedia was first knocked about in Canadian jurisprudence in Bajraktaraj v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
When the censorship system was recently put before the Supreme Court in Murthy v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:04 am
The outrage of thinking that Article V of the Constitution can be used! [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:01 pm by charonqc
Sally Bercow v EyeSpyMP, or An interesting dimension the BBC missed. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
A woman v Hemel Hempstead Gazette, 10.9.13. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:52 am by Robert Chang
Simon Tam has been using the S-word as his band’s name since 2006. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  As the article notes, this is something to keep in mind should Roe v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am by INFORRM
  There is a press release from his solicitors, Simons Muirhead & Burton. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm by Alfred Brophy
 Most people have seen those two books as rather different -- the first interested more in economic issues and common law; the second more jurisprudence and constitutional law. [read post]