Search for: "People v. Steele" Results 441 - 460 of 701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2013, 5:57 am by Marissa Miller
Steel Corp., a recently granted case which asks what constitutes “changing clothes” within the meaning of Section 203(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:31 am by John Dzienkowski
[Editor's note: John Steele is posting this entry authored by co-blogger Nicole Hyland, using the blog's "owner's account."] [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm by Justin Silverman
Peltz-Steele in his recently published text, The Law of Access to Government. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm by Justin Silverman
Peltz-Steele in his recently published text, The Law of Access to Government. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm by Epstein Becker Green
”   The Court also found, and the parties did not dispute, that based on the Supreme Court’s ruling in New Process Steel, L.P. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
” The Court also found, and the parties did not dispute, that based on the Supreme Court’s ruling in New Process Steel, L.P. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
How are lawyers supposed to advise clients who want to form or are already operating Delaware limited liability companies on the critical question of manager fiduciary duties in the wake of last week’s blockbuster ruling by the Delaware Supreme Court in the Auriga Capital v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
Resolved complaints since our last round up include: [Week commencing 20 August]: Mr Wayne Jenkins v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 24/08/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Frank Kane v Newtownards Chronicle, Clause 3, 23/08/2012; Mr Serge Voronov v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Linda Sutherland… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 4:09 am by Stan
For people who thought that the A/V products case was about film quotas and profit sharing, I can certainly understand why they would disappointed by the eventual deal struck between the U.S. and China, which did involve adjustments in both of those areas. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
E.g., regulate collective bargaining at a steel mill, because a strike at the steel mill substantially affects the interstate shipment of goods and materials to and from the mill. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:48 pm by WIMS
Circuit in the case of Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]