Search for: "People v. Turner" Results 441 - 460 of 493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
People who had to figure out a way to pay for their mortgage, education, retirement, and so on. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
The Escobar Case As Modern Healthcare recently reported, the implied certification theory is heading to the Supreme Court via the case of Universal Health Services v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Rena Steinzor
Turner and associate Alexandra Hamilton, the piece announces unnecessarily that agencies issue a great deal of guidance, as demonstrated by the case Appalachian Power Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 7:17 am by John Floyd
  In fact, in 2017, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Turner v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
 The Kat thanks his friend Isabel Davies (Boyes Turner) for this snippet of news. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
The trial court's original order entering the jury verdict is available on Westlaw as Liebeck v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:09 am by admin
Fletcher is a well-known investor –   So was Bernie – and even people who are honest can get way overextended. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am by Phil Dixon
To determine whether a detainee’s constitutional rights have been violated by a jail or prison, the court applies the “legitimate penological purposes” test from Turner v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Apr. 29, 2009)(Unpub)Stepmom flips dismissal of her gender, retaliation/discharge claim, citing supervisor's statements of working mom animus> Noted here: Alaska Employment Law10th CircuitØ Turner v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
By Amnesty International’s count, since 2001 over 500 people have died in the US as a result of Taser use. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]