Search for: "Peoples v. Arkansas, State of" Results 441 - 460 of 650
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
(Sometimes state and federal attorneys general can sue over drugs that were falsely marketed, like how Johnson & Johnson was just walloped for $1.2 billion in Arkansas for improper marketing of Risperdal, but consumers can’t, because those same legislators and judges have delivered mortal wounds to most consumer class actions.) [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:54 pm by Steve Davies
Thus, plaintiffs will be able to continue to possess animals, transport them within the state, or sell them to another party within the state without a permit. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
But Arkansas courts are the final interpreters of the state constitution (though of course the people can change it, if they wish), and therefore the U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:30 am
That decision was given in response to the Pliva v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:00 pm by Steve Davies
Central Puget Growth Management Hearings Board (11-457) Challenge goes to Supreme Court (Article on Pacific Legal Foundation website) Amicus brief filed by Citizens’ Alliance for Property Rights Opposition brief (Hood Canal Environmental Council, Futurewise, People for Puget Sound, Kitsap Citizens for Responsible Planning, and West Sound Conservation Council) SCOTUSBlog also informs that the court’s March 30 conference will include consideration of… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am by Kiran Bhat
Bonnie Goldstein of the Washington Post’s She The People blog looks at Tuesday’s arguments in Miller v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:02 pm by bradhendrickslawfirm
It is a top-down, one-size-fits-all "tort reform" bill which would dictate to every State, including Arkansas, what juries have the right to decide. [read post]