Search for: "Powers v. Common Council"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
In Vance v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal & Ors, heard 3-4 Dec 2018. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:06 pm
To this task comes BCTI:The BCTI is convened and powered by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), and brings together more than 60 Commissioners – a group of global leaders from business, the investor community, intergovernmental organizations, civil society and academia. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31] that could decimate the power of public-sector unions across the nation. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
It would have been a step too far for our predecessors in the common law no more than a generation or so ago. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 2:51 am
This in turn gave rise to a power of detention pending deportation (the Immigration Act 1971 Sch 3, para 2). [read post]
3 May 2020, 10:48 am
Then, and of greater wider significance at least for Right to Buy leases, there is Piechnik v Oxford City Council (2020) EWHC 960 (QB). [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:05 am
: off-topic, but an interesting take on Grainger v Nicholson. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:09 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm
In fact, this event was not “secret”, though it was for an invited audience only, with the press and public excluded – a common format for conferences in the Council of Europe. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In Thoburn v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
Moreover, the relationship between Claimant and LQHT was contractual, which was at the core of R v Servite Houses, ex p Goldsmith [2001] LGR 55, as approved in YL v Birmingham City Council [2007] 3 WLR 112. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
Moreover, the relationship between Claimant and LQHT was contractual, which was at the core of R v Servite Houses, ex p Goldsmith [2001] LGR 55, as approved in YL v Birmingham City Council [2007] 3 WLR 112. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 11:52 pm
It is unlikely to be resisted by the Commons. [read post]
